# Send the Exact Correction.

> Contact Acsend Peptides — Recovery & Tissue Repair Research Peptides — Contact the Acsend Peptides editorial desk about Recovery & Tissue Repair research peptide citations, corrections, identity issues, or evidence framing.

**EDITORIAL DESK / SOURCE NOTES**

Page. Passage. Source. The desk will check the chain.

## Editorial correspondence

The desk accepts notes about citations, compound identity, study design, regulatory framing, and evidence level. The most useful message names the page, quotes the passage at issue, and supplies the primary source that supports a correction. A journal citation, stable database record, or formal regulatory document is enough to begin a check.

The desk is especially interested in identity errors. TB-500 fragment evidence must remain separate from full-length thymosin beta-4 evidence. Animal outcomes must remain labeled by species. Combination-formulation results must not be assigned to a single ingredient. Safety observations must not be retold as efficacy.

**Editorial mailbox:** editors@acsendpeptides.com

## Scope of reply

Acsend Peptides does not answer purchasing, sourcing, personal dosing, diagnosis, treatment, or protocol questions. It does not evaluate individual symptoms. It does not verify research-grade products. Those requests sit outside the editorial scope.

Source-backed corrections are reviewed against the signed corpus and the cited publication. A note may reveal a wording problem without changing the evidence level. It may also identify a material issue: wrong molecule, wrong species, wrong endpoint, or unsupported numerical precision. Those corrections receive priority.

General feedback is welcome. Promotional submissions are not part of the record. Supplier testimonials do not replace controlled evidence. Unpublished anecdotes may describe a signal, but they cannot establish frequency, causation, efficacy, or safety.

## Before writing

The [comparison](/compare) page states the site's evidence framework. The [references](/references) page lists the complete current source set. Reading both often resolves whether a disagreement concerns the underlying study or the strength assigned to it.

Keep the note narrow. State the proposed change. State why the current language fails. Link the best available primary source. The desk will handle the rest.

---

An independent ascent map for repair evidence; no storefront, clinical direction, or borrowed certainty.